Polity and Governance Black_Money_in_Electoral_Process The Supreme Court emphasized the Election Commission of India's duty to eliminate black money in elections, noting its threat to democracy. It urged swift investigations and trials of related cases and required compliance reports from the Election Commission and state governments. Syllabus: GS2/Polity and Governance
This CurrentPulse analysis synthesizes unique exam-relevant inputs from the following sources.
← Previous Article
Next Article →
Prelims: Polity & Governance — institutions, terminology and factual features connected with the development.
Mains: GS-2 — contemporary application of the relevant syllabus theme.
Current–static link: Revise the underlying institution, policy or concept together with this development.
Polity and Governance Black_Money_in_Electoral_Process The Supreme Court emphasized the Election Commission of India's duty to eliminate black money in elections, noting its threat to democracy.
The Election Commission of India (ECI) placed before the Court data showing 3,87,430 FIRs registered during the 2024 Lok Sabha elections, of which only about 42.9% (1,66,044) had resulted in convictions, with the remainder pending investigation or trial.
Union of India, it reiterated that ‘the ballot is more potent than the most powerful gun’.
Syllabus: GS2/Polity and Governance
The Supreme Court has recently passed directives to check unexplained cash and electoral offences, stating that voter choices influenced by illicit money are detrimental to free and fair elections and the ‘very essence of democracy’.
The black money in elections is used to influence voters, support the campaign, distribute cash or gifts and fulfil election related expenses through unaccounted or undeclared money outside the legal framework.
It creates an uneven electoral playing field and can develop a link between money, crime and politics.
The issue came before the Supreme Court in Prathik Parasrampuria v.
State of Karnataka, arising from a Karnataka High Court decision (2015) quashing an FIR concerning alleged hoarding of cash for voter bribery.
The Court expanded the proceedings to examine the broader systemic problem of black money in elections.
It urged swift investigations and trials of related cases and required compliance reports from the Election Commission and state governments.
Distinguish the immediate development from the permanent mandate or structure of the institution concerned.
Revise exact names, dates, locations and legal or institutional terms from the source points; do not infer facts not stated there.
Examine the significance of “Black Money in Elections Hampers Democracy: SC”. Discuss its key implications and the way forward.
Begin with the immediate development and identify the central institution or policy issue.
End with a balanced, institutionally feasible way forward without making claims beyond the available evidence.